文档类型
文章
出版日期
2011年
出版来源
《心理学和基督教
卷号
30.
问题数量
3
第一页
223年
最后一页
238年
出版商
基督教心理研究协会
石头
0733 - 4273
文摘
这个主题之间实验关注罪犯反应他们过去的人际交往的过犯在认同基督教本科生(55米,85 F)。参与者完成了张后措施四个随机分配20分钟的写作条件之一:悔改(即。、写建设性的悲伤,道歉,归还,行为改变),进攻沉思(即。,自我辩护(即负打滚)。,externalizing blame, minimizing costs), or distraction (i.e., daily details). Offense rumination and repentance writing included the most cost-oriented language; rumination had the most negative emotion language. Mixed within (pre vs. post) X between group ANOVA interactions yielded theoretically meaningful results. Repentance reduced self-condemnation and regret while increasing conciliatory motivations toward the victim (to apologize, make restitution, and seek forgiveness). Offense rumination was associated with remorse and self-condemning isolation from the victim and God. Self-justification reduced remorse and self-condemnation, and exaggerated perceptions of divine forgiveness. Implications for the interrelated literatures on interpersonal offenses, confession, apology, restitution, repentance, forgivenessseeking, and self-forgiveness are addressed. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
关键字
认同基督教徒,悔改,进攻沉思,自我辩护
建议引用
Witvliet, C.V.O.何曼,净收益Exline, J.J.,& Brandt, T. (2011). Responding to our own transgressions: An experimental writing study of repentance, offense rumination, selfjustification, and distraction.《心理学和基督教,30岁,223 - 238。
评论
访问《心理学和基督教http://caps.net/membership/publications/jpc